32
Albert of Aachen. P. 84; Comnena A. Vol. 2. P. 220–234; Asbridge T.S. The First Crusade. P. 103–113.
33
Raymond of Aguilers. P. 42–43; Gesta Francorum. P. 15; Fulcher of Chartres. P. 187; Albert of Aachen. P. 118–120.
34
Татикий был евнухом и очень способным генералом. Говорили, что в начале своей военной карьеры он лишился носа и носил на лице золотую копию.
35
Gesta Francorum. P. 15; Hagenmeyer H. Kreuzzugsbriefe. P. 138–140; Comnena A. Vol. 2. P. 230, 234.
36
Fulcher of Chartres. P. 202–203; Zajac W.G. Captured property on the First Crusade / The First Crusade: Origins and Impact. Ed. J.P. Phillips. Manchester, 1997. P. 153–186.
37
Gesta Francorum. P. 18–21; Fulcher of Chartres. P. 192–199; France J. Victory in the East. P. 170–185; Asbridge T.S. The First Crusade. P. 133–137.
38
Albert of Aachen. P. 138–140. Цитата была сокращена; Gesta Francorum. P. 23.
39
Asbridge T.S. The Creation of the Principality of Antioch 1098–1130. Woodbridge, 2000. P. 16–19; France J. Victory in the East. P. 190–196; Albert of Aachen. P. 170.
40
Я лично поддержал это предположение в 2004 году. Asbridge T.S. The First Crusade. P. 153–157.
41
Hagenmeyer H. Kreuzzugsbriefe. P. 150; Raymond of Aguilers. P. 47–48.
42
Gesta Francorum. P. 42; Fulcher of Chartres. P. 221; Albert of Aachen. P. 208–210, 236–238; Hagenmeyer H. Kreuzzugsbriefe. P. 150; Matthew of Edessa. P. 167–168.
43
Fulcher of Chartres. P. 224–226; Asbridge T.S. The First Crusade. P. 169–196. О дебатах относительно отбытия Татикия см.: Lilie R.-J. Byzantium and the Crusader States. P. 33–37; France J. The departure of Tatikios from the army of the First Crusade / Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research. Vol. 44. 1971. P. 131–147; France J. Victory in the East. P. 243. О первой осаде Антиохии см. также: Rogers R. Latin Siege Warfare in the Twelfth Century. Oxford, 1992. P. 25–38.
44
Hagenmeyer H. Kreuzzugsbriefe. P. 151; Raymond of Aguilers. P. 58. Об отношениях первых крестоносцев с мусульманами Ближнего Востока см.: Köhler М.A. Allianzen und Verträge zwischen frankischen und islamischen Herrschern in Vorderren Orient. Berlin, 1991. P. 1—72; Asbridge T.S. Knowing the enemy: Latin relations with Islam at the time of the First Crusade / Knighthoods of Christ. Ed. N. Housley. Aldershot, 2007. P. 17–25; Albert of Aachen. P. 268.
45
Fulcher of Chartres. P. 233; Albert of Aachen. P. 282–284; Gesta Francorum. P. 48.
46
Gesta Francorum. P. 48; Tudebode P. P. 97; Albert of Aachen. P. 298–300. Цитата была сокращена.
47
Raymond of Aguilers. P. 75; Gesta Francorum. P. 65–66.
48
Asbridge T.S. The Holy Lance of Antioch: Power, devotion and memory on the First Crusade / Reading Medieval Studies. Vol. 33. 2007. P. 3–36.
49
Matthew of Edessa. P. 171; Ibn al-Athir. Vol. 1. P. 16; Albert of Aachen. P. 320.
50
Ibn al-Qalanisi. P. 46. О битве при Антиохии см.: France J. Victory in the East. P. 280–296; Asbridge T.S. The First Crusade. P. 232–240.
51
Raymond of Aguilers. P. 75; Morris C. Policy and vision: The case of the Holy Lance found at Antioch / War and Government in the Middle Ages: Essays in honour of J.O. Prestwich. Ed. J. Gillingham and J.C. Holt. Woodbridge, 1984. P. 33–45.
52
Fulcher of Chartres. P. 266–267; Raymond of Aguilers. P. 101; Asbridge T.S. The principality of Antioch and the Jabal as-Summaq / The First Crusade: Origins and Impact. Ed. J.P. Phillips. Manchester, 1997. P. 142–152. Для альтернативного чтения об этих событиях см.: Hill J.H. and L.L. Raymond IV, Count of Toulouse. P. 85—109; France J. The crisis of the First Crusade from the defeat of Kerbogha to the departure from Arqa / Byzantion. Vol. 40. 1970. P. 276–308.
53
Raymond of Aguilers. P. 120–124, 128–129, Fulcher of Chartres. P. 238–241.
54
Albert of Aachen. P. 402.
55
Fulcher of Chartres. P. 281–292. О средневековом Иерусалиме см.: Boas A.J. Jerusalem in the Time of the Crusades. London, 2001; Prawer J. The Jerusalem the crusaders captured: A contribution to the medieval topography of the city / Crusade and Settlement. Ed. P.W. Edbury. Cardiff, 1985. P. 1—16; France J. Victory in the East. P. 333–335, 337–343.
56
Raymond of Aguilers. P. 139—41; Albert of Aachen. P. 410–412. Об осаде Иерусалима см.: France J. Victory in the East. P. 332–355; Rogers R. Latin Siege Warfare. P. 47–63; Asbridge T.S. The First Crusade. P. 298–316.
57
Raymond of Aguilers. P. 141–142; Albert of Aachen. P. 422.
58
Raymond of Aguilers. P. 146–148; Albert of Aachen. P. 416.
59
Raymond of Aguilers. P. 148–149; Fulcher of Chartres. P. 296–299.
60
Raymond of Aguilers. P. 150; Gesta Francorum. P. 91; Robert the Monk. P. 868.
61
Ibn al-Athir. P. 21–22; Fulcher of Chartres. P. 304–305; Kedar B.Z. The Jerusalem massacre of 1099 in the western historiography of the crusades / Crusades. Vol. 3. 2004. P. 15–75.
62
42 Историки продолжают спорить относительно точной природы титула Годфруа. Он мог использовать термин «князь», но представляется определенным, что он не называл себя королем Иерусалима. Об этом см.: Riley-Smith J.S.C. The title of Godfrey of Bouillon / Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research. Vol. 52. 1979. P. 83–86; France J. The election and title of Godfrey de Bouillon / Canadian Journal of History. Vol. 18. 1983. P. 321–329; Murray A.V. The Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem: A Dynastic History 1099–1125. Oxford, 2000. P. 63–77.
63
Tudebode P. P. 146–147; France J. Victory in the East. P. 360–365; Asbridge T.S. The First Crusade. P. 323–327.
64
О Крестовом походе 1101 года см.: Riley-Smith J.S.C. The First Crusade and the Idea of Crusading. P. 120–134; Cate J.L. The crusade of 1101 / A History of the Crusades. Ed. K.M. Setton. Vol. 1, 2nd edn. Madison, 1969. P. 343–367; Mullinder A. The Crusading Expeditions of 1101–1102 (Неопубликованная докторская диссертация, университет Уэльса). Swansea, 1996.
65
О дебатах относительно центрального места Gesta Francorum как источника сведений о Первом крестовом походе и личности автора см.: Krey А.С. A neglected passage in the Gesta and its bearing on the literature of the First Crusade / The Crusades and Other Historical Essays presented to Dana C. Munro by his former students. Ed. L.J. Paetow. New York, 1928. P. 57–78; Wolf K.B. Crusade and narrative: Bohemond and the «Gesta Francorum» / Journal of Medieval History. Vol. 17. 1991. P. 207–216; Morris C. The «Gesta Francorum» as narrative history / Reading Medieval Studies. Vol. 19. 1993. P. 55–71; France J. The Anonymous «Gesta Francorum» and the «Historia Francorum qui ceperunt Iherusalem» of Raymond of Aguilers and the «Historia de Hierosolymitano Itinere» of Peter Tudebode / The Crusades and Their Sources: Essays Presented to Bernard Hamilton. Ed. J. France and W.G. Zajac. Aldershot, 1998. P. 39–69; France J. The use of the anonymous «Gesta Francorum» in the early twelfth-century sources for the First Crusade / From Clermont to Jerusalem: The Crusades and Crusader Societies, 1095–1500. Ed. A.V. Murray. Turnhout, 1998. P. 29–42; Rubenstein J. What is the «Gesta Francorum» and who was Peter Tudebode? / Revue Mabillon. Vol. 16. 2005. P. 179–204.
66
Kedar B.Z. The Jerusalem massacre of 1099. P. 16–30; La Chanson d’Antioche / Ed. S. Duparc-Quioc, 2 vols. Paris, 1982; The Canso d’Antioca: An Occitan Epic Chronicle of the First Crusade / Trans. C. Sweetenham and L. Paterson. Aldershot, 2003. Обсуждение рассказа Роберта Монаха см.: Sweetenham С. Robert the Monk’s History of the First Crusade. Aldershot, 2005. P. 1—71. О роли памяти см.: Asbridge T.S. The Holy Lance of Antioch. P. 20–26; Edgington S.B. Holy Land, Holy Lance: religious ideas in the Chanson d’Antioche / The Holy Land, Holy Lands and Christian History, Studies in Church History. Ed. R.N. Swanson. Vol. 36. Woodbridge, 2000. P. 142–153; Edgington S.B. Romance and reality in the sources for the sieges of Antioch, 1097–1098 / Porphyrogenita. Ed. C. Dendrinos, J. Harris, E. Harvalia-Crook, J. Herrin. Aldershot, 2003. P. 33–46; Katzir Y. The conquests of Jerusalem, 1099 and 1187: Historical memory and religious typology / The Meeting of Two Worlds: Cultural Exchange between East and West in the Period of the Crusades. Ed. V.P. Goss. Kalamazoo, 1986. P. 103–113; Powell J.M. Myth, legend, propaganda, history: The First Crusade, 1140–1300 / Autour de la Premiere Croisade. Ed. M. Balard. Paris, 1996. P. 127–141.
67
Ibn al-Qalanisi. P. 44, 48; Ibn al-Athir. P. 21–22; al-Azimi. P. 372–373; Hillenbrand C. The First Crusade: The Muslim perspective / The First Crusade: Origins and Impact. Ed. J.P. Phillips. Manchester, 1997. P. 130–141; Hillenbrand C. The Crusades: Islamic Perspectives. P. 50–68.
68
Hillenbrand C. The Crusades: Islamic Perspectives. P. 68–74; Drory J. Early Muslim reflections on the Crusaders / Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam. Vol. 25. 2001. P. 92—101; Ephrat D., Kahba M.D. Muslim reaction to the Frankish presence in Bilad al-Sham: intensifying religious fidelity within the masses / Al-Masaq. Vol. 15. 2003. P. 47–58; Hamblin W.J. To wage jihad or not: Fatimid Egypt during the early crusades / The Jihad and its Times. Ed. H. Dajani-Shakeel, R.A. Mossier. Ann Arbor, 1991. P. 31–40. Аль-Сулами был особенно необычным, потому что точно установил, что франки ведут священную войну, имея целью Иерусалим. Он также считал Крестовый поход частью более широкого наступления христиан против ислама, которое включало конфликты в Иберии и на Сицилии. Sivan Е. La genèse de la contre-croisade: un traité Damasquin du début du XIIe siècle / Journal Asiatique. Vol. 254. 1966. P. 197–224; Christie N. Jerusalem in the «Kitab al-Jihad» of Ali ibn Tahir al-Sulami / Medieval Encounters. Vol. 13.2. 2007. P. 209–221; Christie N., Gerish D. Parallel preaching: Urban II and al-Sulami / Al-Masaq. Vol. 15. 2003. P. 139–148.
